FIKR
Assessment

How students are evaluated.

A balance of weekly oral discipline, sustained scholarly writing, an annual viva, a research colloquium, and a final capstone.

One

Weekly Oral Quizzes

Each week begins with an oral quiz on the prior session's Arabic text and arguments. Seven dimensions are assessed across every quiz.

  • 01
    Arabic text reading
  • 02
    Translation and parsing
  • 03
    Conceptual definitions
  • 04
    Argument reconstruction
  • 05
    Comparative theology
  • 06
    Western philosophy application
  • 07
    Contemporary response
Two

Four Yearly Papers

Four sustained papers per year, distributed across the traditions and Western philosophy. Word counts grow with the student.

Year 1
  • Textual Exposition Paper
    1,500–2,000 words
  • School Comparison Paper
    1,800–2,500 words
  • Logic and Argument Paper
    1,800–2,500 words
  • Western Philosophy Interface Paper
    2,000–3,000 words
Year 2
  • Systematic Kalām Paper
    2,500–3,500 words
  • Advanced Comparative Theology Paper
    2,500–3,500 words
  • Philosophy of Religion Paper
    2,500–3,500 words
  • Research Bibliography and Method Paper
    2,000–3,000 words plus bibliography
Year 3
  • High Scholastic Kalām Paper
    3,000–4,500 words
  • Neo-Kalām Paper
    3,000–4,500 words
  • Contemporary Application Paper
    3,500–5,000 words
  • Final Capstone Paper
    5,000–7,500 words
Submission Rhythm

Forty-Week Paper Timeline

  1. 1
    Paper 1
    Week 10
    Textual exposition / school grounding
  2. 2
    Paper 2
    Week 20
    Comparative or systematic engagement
  3. 3
    Paper 3
    Week 30
    Philosophical interface
  4. 4
    Paper 4
    Week 38–40
    Capstone or method paper
Three

Annual Oral Examination

A formal viva at year's end

Students sit before a panel of faculty for a sustained oral examination. The viva evaluates textual, comparative, and philosophical fluency across the year's anchor texts and satellite readings.

  • Reading and parsing an unseen Arabic passage
  • Defining and locating key technical terms
  • Reconstructing a major argument from memory
  • Comparing the schools on a chosen problem
  • Engaging a philosophical or contemporary objection
Four

Research Colloquium

A recurring Sunday session where students present work-in-progress papers and receive structured critique from faculty and peers.

Present

Each student presents a paper draft or research argument twice per year.

Respond

A designated peer responds in writing and orally, modeling academic exchange.

Revise

Final papers integrate colloquium feedback before submission to faculty.

Five

Final Capstone

In the final year, each student produces a 5,000–7,500 word capstone paper integrating the three pillars of the program: a primary text or corpus from the Sunni kalām tradition, a sustained argument formalized through manṭiq or modern logic, and engagement with a Western philosophical or contemporary theological problem.

  • ProposalSubmitted by Week 8 of Year 3
  • Bibliography ReviewWeek 16
  • DraftWeek 28, presented at colloquium
  • DefenseWeek 38, oral defense before faculty
Six

Grading Distribution

Weekly oral quizzes20%
Four yearly papers35%
Annual oral examination20%
Research colloquium10%
Final capstone (Year 3)10%
Seminar participation5%